NICHOLAS OF CUSA
(1401 64)
NEOPLATONISM
Nicholas of Cusa (or Cusanus, also known as Krebs or Kryfts)
was born at Kues (Cusa) in the German Rhineland, and educated at the famous
school of Deventer and then at the Universities of Heidelberg (philosophy,
1416), Padua (canon law, 1417-23), and Cologne (theology, 1425). After ordination he worked for the Church in
various capacities. In 1448 he was
created Cardinal, and in 1450 was appointed Bishop of Brixen. From 1451-52 he was Papal Legate.
KNOWLEDGE
[1] [See On Learned Ignorance I.] For Nicholas the lowest level of knowledge is that of sense-perception. From here we may proceed to a level of reason (ratio) [a],
which is limited by the principle of contradiction and excludes opposites; it
both affirms and denies. Our knowledge
of finite creatures is approximate;
'science' in general is 'conjectural'. The highest level of knowledge
is attained by the intellect (intellectus), which passes beyond all oppositions to
apprehend God. While this may be affirmed positively, albeit through symbols particularly
that of light rather than ordinary language (as used by reason), as finite beings we can only
know what God is not (the negative way); and this must be asymptotic never perfect. We therefore remain in a state of 'learned ignorance' (docta ignorantia), in which we recognise both our
limitations and the infinity and transcendence of God. Herein lies wisdom [b].
METAPHYSICS/ PHILOSOPHY OF NATURE
[2] [Ibid. I - III.] God is indefinable; or, rather, He defines
Himself. He is eternal power and act,
totally unlimited and
infinite. As the 'coincidence of
opposites' (coincidentia oppositorum)
(and thus transcending the law of non-contradiction) He is both maximum and
minimum [a]: maximum because He is the greatest
Being; minimum because He cannot be less than he is. Moreover, He cannot be of a certain size as
we understand the attribute. In Him essence and existence
coincide [b]. Although immanent
in the world, He remains transcendent; and He may be said to be omnia
complicans, in that all things are contained or 'folded' in His unity and necessity, and omnia explicans, as the ultimate source of 'unfolding' multiplicity and possibility [c], that
is, the world as a visible
manifestation of Him as 'light' [c]. It can be shown that He must exist as there cannot be an infinite
series of finite beings, and there must be an absolute truth [d] which Nicholas identifies with God as the 'absolute maximum'. The world is a 'contraction'
or 'expressed limitation' of God. It is a collection of universal forms which
are identical to and emanate from the Godhead [e] as
the 'greatest concrete' (concretum
maximum) or 'condensation'. All created things are arranged in a hierarchy of being [f]. Despite this commitment to universal
forms, Nicholas emphasizes the
individuality of created things the forms existing in the individuals in the 'contracted' state. Particular individuals may of course belong
to a given species by virtue of their possession of the appropriate common
specific nature or 'contracted form'. These common features, however, are themselves individual
natures: their 'universality cannot be
said to exist except as a concept [g]. But the absolute greatness of God (absolutum maximum) is never realized in any finite individual, as each one is
unlimited and does not possess all the perfections belonging to its
species. Just as the universe is a
contraction of God, so finite
beings are contractions of the universe: each contracts and is 'mirrored' in every other thing. The universe is therefore a harmony of
plurality in unity, a manifestation of God in whom the opposites are
reconciled. Man as a microcosm mirrors the macrocosm [h]. There is no 'universal' soul of
the world, except in so far as the forms of individuals exist in God. God is thus in a sense the World-Soul [i]. The universe is spatially infinite in that it is not limited by
any other universe; and within the universe we perceive all things as in
relative motion. It is also only a 'relative maximum', not completely or totally infinite (only
God is the 'absolute maximum'), but it is of endless and therefore infinite duration, proceeding from
God as absolute eternity [j]. Duration is not the same as time, though both
proceed from and are in a sense the 'image' of eternity; for time is a function of
measurement of motion and thus depends on mind [k]. All motion might cease, yet duration would
remain.
CRITICAL SUMMARY
Nicholas is best seen as a
transitional figure of the Italian Renaissance. An eclectic thinker, he was
influenced by contemporary developments in science while maintaining his
metaphysics and religious commitment. In
his philosophy we find a revival of Neoplatonism, perhaps as a response to the
anti-metaphysical and sceptical trends of the fourteenth century and the
separation of reason from faith. The
central claims he makes are (1) that there are different degrees of knowledge,
culminating in an intellectual intuition of unity; (2) that this unity is of a
'coincidence of opposites' underlying contradictories in reality; (3) that man
is a finite microcosm which mirrors the infinite universe itself a
manifestation of the immanent-transcendent God. Through reason we can know only what God is not; and we must remain in a
state of 'learned ignorance'.
.Nicholas's philosophy clearly has much more in common with early
medieval thought than with later Aristotelian scholasticism. At the same time his negative approach to God
and the identification of Him with the 'coincidence of opposites' is suggestive
of 19th century German Idealism. On both
counts he is of course a legitimate target for more empirically minded
philosophers not least because of his (affirmative) assumption that
contradictions are reconciled in God.
Nicholas: De Docta Ignorantia (1440) (On
Learned Ignorance). This is perhaps
his best-known work, though he wrote many others. Selections are available in Wippel and Wolter
(eds), Medieval Philosophy.
Studies
L. Dupré
and N. Hudson, 'Nicholas of Cusa', in J. J. E. Garcia (ed.), A Companion to
Philosophy in the Middle Ages.
H. Bett, Nicholas of Cusa.
CONNECTIONS
Nicholas of Cusa