CARNEADES
SCEPTICISM
Founder of the New
(Third) Academy Carneades was born in Cyrene (now in Libya). He was famed as a disputant and orator. He was noted also for his powers of
concentration, often to the neglect of his food and appearance. He was sent on a political mission to Rome in
156, where his brilliance in argument and oratory made a considerable
impression on the youth of the city. As
a philosopher he is seen as an important critic of the Stoics and Epicureans,
but he left no writings; we learn of his philosophy through later commentators
such as Sextus Empiricus.
KNOWLEDGE/ RELIGION
[1] Carneades maintained a sceptical position in relation
to all claims to knowledge [a]. Sense-experience
is unreliable; we can never be sure whether a presentation is real, a dream, or
an illusion. And because our concepts
are grounded in experience and are 'affected' by the mind we cannot appeal to
reason to judge between true and false representations. All arguments must likewise be suspect,
because the premisses are questionable. He therefore also rejected Stoic
proofs for the existence of 'God' [b]; assumptions of a popular consensus that
the universe is animate, or that there is a universal Reason, Spirit, or
Designer, are all unprovable. Indeed the
very notion of an animate yet material, virtuous, omniscient, and providential
God is incoherent. If 'God' can feel and
sense, he must ultimately disintegrate. How could he be courageous? How
can he allow man, whom supposedly he endowed with reason, to misuse that
faculty? If the omission was deliberate,
such a being could not be virtuous: if
it was unintentional he could not be the infinite reason. A Nature which is characterized by regularity must include evil and
this is real for man; a providential God could not be exonerated for its
existence [c].
[2] Carneades rejected
the idea of a complete suspension of judgement (the epoché) [a] and proposed a theory of probability which involved successive grades or
approximations to the truth depending on the number and kinds of
supporting reasons. Certainty, however, can never be
attained [b][b]. He also rejected determinism, arguing (1) that given the large
number of chance events in Nature complete predictability is not possible; and
(2) that human action
stems from a will which is cause of itself and not subject to external physical
chains of causality [c].
ETHICS
[3] Carneades says that virtue, understood as conformity to nature, is not an end in itself;
and there are many other things which are not bad or morally indifferent (adiaphora) and which are desired, for
example, reputation, pleasures [a]. He
therefore advocates the
"art of living", which involves the use of common sense and probabilities to
satisfy impulses and desires [b].
CRITICAL
SUMMARY
The strength of Carneades' scepticism lies
in his attacks on dogmatism in both epistemology and metaphysics. His recognition that total suspension of
judgement is not possible and his introduction of a doctrine of probability
went some way towards answering the criticism that a thoroughgoing scepticism
would be liable to undermine human ethics and action. However, there is some dispute as to whether
this probability should be understood in an epistemological sense rather than a
purely psychological one, as the Greek term (to pithanon) can be translated as 'persuasion' as well as
'likelihood'. It is possible also that,
while able to argue for any position, Carneades had no positive views of his
own.
CONNECTIONS
Carneades