PROCLUS
NEOPLATONISM
The last major
Neoplatonist of antiquity, Proclus was born in Constantinople and studied philosophy
in Athens. He subsequently lived a
disciplined and meditative life as a teacher, writer, and head of the Athenian
School of Neoplatonism.
METAPHYSICS/ RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHY
[1] The central principle of Proclus's system is that of the One the First Cause
(arche), the primary principle and
Absolute Good and Beauty which for
religious purposes could be equated with God [a]. However, he denies that we can have any
positive knowledge of the One; we can predicate qualities of it only negatively [b]. Although the
One is regarded as the source of all individual beings, Proclus thinks of the
primary being as unchanging. To reconcile change and
permanence, identity and difference, unity and multiplicity he introduces the
concept of a triadic development (the hypostases) of individual beings [see, for example, Platonic Theology, II, 4] [c]. (1) Effects are said to remain in the primary principle (nome) and thus far are partially
identical with it and it with them. (2)
By virtue of the eternal
procession (proodos) or emanation [d] lower orders of beings are different from the real
One. (3) Individual beings, however, 'turn back' (the epistrophe) towards the One as ultimate
source in so far as they possess a natural tendency to seek the Good [e][e]. These two processes, the one fragmenting the other
unifying, are thus complementary. And
throughout this emanation the One suffers no diminution [Elements 27]. The cosmos as a whole is thus essentially immaterial and mental [f] for Proclus.
[2] The procession of being from the One to the many is also described
by Proclus in terms of a continuous hierarchy of ever more inferior stages [a]. From the superior
One emanates the 'units' (henades),
which can be understood metaphysically as superessences, theologically as
'gods', and ethically as exemplifications of goodness. The units produce the realm of Nous [b]
divisible into the spheres of Being, Life, and Thought, each of which admits of
further subdivision [III, 14]. From Nous proceeds the Soul. This contains the three spheres of divine, 'demonic', and human souls (psuche). Proclus thinks of the
Soul as both mirroring the supersensible realm and (as World-Soul) acting as a
model for the sensory realm [c] the world itself, which he regards as a
living creature guided by the divine soul. He identifies the
One with Reality and as the universal consciousness or Mind [d]. It follows that all things emanating or processing from it are
decreasingly real and increasingly appearance according to the degree they have
fallen away from the One [e], terminating in the ephemeral and
discrete thoughts and sensations constituting individual human minds. Humans as appearances exist in the One and
know it, though only in a limited way. Each consciousness is reflected
in and partially known in every other [f]. As he says, "All things are in all things in
their appropriate manner" [Elements,
103]. To explain the continuous emanation from
the One down through the multiple levels, Proclus introduces the concepts or ontological principles of power (or capacity) and activity. Each partial reality possesses (implicitly)
power to 'cause' ('below' it) and (as effect) to be caused by and to 'return' to the reality 'above'
it [g]. But between each of two such realities there
is also a third which is the activity (process or possibility) of the first and
which possesses its own power. As for
the one Reality itself, since it is
beyond description it cannot be said to 'have' a power. Its reality and power are therefore only
successive, that is, distinct from it as respectively (a) definiteness, and (b)
infinity.
[3] The plurality of things emanating from the One are relatively imperfect or 'evil' to the
degree they have 'fallen away'. In his account of this Proclus postulates
(1) 'unpossessed' perfect characteristics or qualities; (2) imperfect
characteristics caused by (1); and (3) individual instances caused by (2). The One itself, considered from the first aspect, is the perfect form
of unity, and yet is also the totality of 'possessed' imperfect things in the
universe considered as its final effect [Platonic Theology I, 17] [a].
ETHICS/ KNOWLEDGE
[4] [See, for example, Platonic
Theology IV.] The One being the Good, Proclus
argues that humans should attempt to return to it [a][a]. This can be achieved by living ascetically, removing
oneself as far as possible from the ephemeral appearances, social
distinctions, and so on, and by cultivating one's reason. By virtue of its possession of a semi-spiritual 'body' Proclus calls
'light [b] the soul can apprehend the various hierarchical
manifestations ('theophanies') of the One [c] as it passes through three stages in its ascent: (1) love of Beauty (eros); (2) Truth, which provides the soul with knowledge of
reality the eternal verities Mind, Power, and Being; and (3) Faith, a 'faculty' possessed innately by some
people which enables them to intuit their own unity and thence to 'jump' to a mystical 'intuition' of perfect Unity [d].
CRITICAL SUMMARY
The significance of Proclus's philosophy
lies in his skilful synthesis of a wide range of features drawn from the
thought of Plato and Aristotle, Neoplatonism, and Greek superstition and
religious belief to produce a detailed and subtle system which was to provide a
bridge between post-Aristotelian philosophy and early mediaeval thought. Some of the key features are: the triadic development of a hierarchy of
beings from the One; an emphasis on their objective reality, albeit in varying
degrees, down to individual thoughts and sensations; and the concepts of 'power' and 'activity',
with the aid of which he, arguably, reconciles Plotinian monism with
pluralism. But despite his dialectical
skill there are clearly difficulties in many areas of his philosophy. In particular one might note the following.
(1) There is an unresolved tension in his account of the relationships
between the created world and the One. More analysis is needed of (a) how it can be conceived to be both
identical with and yet different from the One, and (b) how the primary cause is
supposed to suffer no diminution, dilution, or alteration when the created
world emanates from it.
(2) Proclus's concept of hierarchy would seem to require an infinity of
gradations or levels of being. Why, it
may be asked, should there not be yet further intermediaries between, say, nous and Soul, Soul and world, or
between 'activities' understood as realities existing between yet belonging to
the 'higher' of two other realities?
(3) He argues that knowledge and predication can be understood only
negatively of the One, but he allows a mystical apprehension or 'knowledge' via
Truth and Faith. It is questionable
whether this is completely consistent. Arguably it was only with the emergence of scholastic philosophy that
the distinctions between these concepts came to be explored adequately. This should not of course detract from the
importance of Proclus's speculations.
CONNECTIONS
Proclus